May be the usual PG Wodehouse type ones but still hilarious with twists and turns . Predictable but still you want to read . Fabulous language and to put it mildly, exaggerations of events and character with a what you call similies or metaphors drawan from the animal world.
Happens in France in a Chateau, people crawling over one another to lay siege to the "safe" for different reasons.
Wives of one of the rich americans wanting him to become US amabassdaor of France and trying to influence a US senator.
The hero ( or you can call the main character) , a football player and fun loving guy, engaged to one of the brainy types, later in trying to help the daughter of the senator realises that they are more suited to each other and end up getting engaged.
Terrific language and racy read.As one of the book reviewers ( Stephen Fry , I think) mentions, you get in to a fictional world where things are completey hilarious, nothing wrong or bad happens. So what, it keeps people happy , extremely happy. PG Wodehouse creates a world for people to revel and be happy. So do a lot of other novelists do but they make a pretense of high gravity and seriousness. PG Wodehouse does not get in to any such territory. He writes fiction and makes no pretense about it
Tuesday, November 29, 2011
Wednesday, November 23, 2011
Money for nothing- PG Wodehouse
Usual PG Wodehouse , humorous, excellent language, exaggerations, attempted theft by an apparent millionaire who is nothing but a smooth conman from USA and his lady accomplice who is the brain behind the enterprise .The attempted theft is as usual of an English heirloom .
The usual nephew whose property is kept under trust by the uncle who is the title holder . The nephews ( two of them) , one of whom is in love with the neighbour's daughter. The falling off between the uncle and the girl's father and renewal of their freidn ship , forced by the nephew. The usual twists and turns.
Good ( good by PGW standards is great by normal standards ) but not in the same class as a Jeeves or a Psmith or an Emsworth.
The usual nephew whose property is kept under trust by the uncle who is the title holder . The nephews ( two of them) , one of whom is in love with the neighbour's daughter. The falling off between the uncle and the girl's father and renewal of their freidn ship , forced by the nephew. The usual twists and turns.
Good ( good by PGW standards is great by normal standards ) but not in the same class as a Jeeves or a Psmith or an Emsworth.
Friday, November 18, 2011
Liar's Poker by Michael Lewis
Interesting book. Traces how bond trading from the days when it was considered a staid profession to beconing a glamorous and in a way a manly profession. How pampered the bond traders get.
The internal politicking, the show of strengths and the moves have all been traced.
The author was in Salomon brothers in the early part of his career. He starts off as to how coveted the positions in Investment banking companies had become and how he managed to get in to sales and how he becomes an ace salesman.
Author talks of the lack of ethical standards. He brings out how tradres caught with some lousy bonds take the help of salesmen to palm off on gullible inestors.
Good book. Not a very tough read as is the case with Taleb's but may require a revisit to capture the points in toto.
The internal politicking, the show of strengths and the moves have all been traced.
The author was in Salomon brothers in the early part of his career. He starts off as to how coveted the positions in Investment banking companies had become and how he managed to get in to sales and how he becomes an ace salesman.
Author talks of the lack of ethical standards. He brings out how tradres caught with some lousy bonds take the help of salesmen to palm off on gullible inestors.
Good book. Not a very tough read as is the case with Taleb's but may require a revisit to capture the points in toto.
Thursday, October 13, 2011
Champions league T20 RCB Vs South Australia and later Vs New South Wales
Took Vishaal for T 20 matches Royla Challengers Vs South Australi Redbacks and later the semis against New south wales
First time for Vishall, watching a match at the stadium. First day we had N Stand Rs 1000 ticket, not very crowded . He thoroughly enjoyed it. SA batted first and score more tha 200 runs. RCB responded very well with excellent scores by Dildhan and later by Virat Kohli. Gayle had given a good start. The match was almost lost towards the final stages. RCB after being in a good position lost their way, lost a number of wickets , the run rate sufferred and ir came to some 13 runs of the last over and 6 of the last ball. Unimaginable, Arun Karthik hit a six of the last ball and won the match for them. They made the semis by the skin of their teeth.
For semis there was a much larger crowd. We went for the Rs 750 ticket P3 Pavilion. Not as good as N stand. It was quite crowded also. We opted for this only because the entry gate to the stand was closer to the ticket counter .
Match again was a high scoring match.200 plus, Galye and Virat Kohli batted very well to win the match. It was a much easire win.
Vishaal as usual had his quota of chips and Coke . Was a bit scared the second day when the crowd was much more and in fact our stand was packed. I had to go and fetch some eatables for him from the stalls while he was sitting.
One the whole enjoyed the experience, may be the first day much more than the secodn day.
First time for Vishall, watching a match at the stadium. First day we had N Stand Rs 1000 ticket, not very crowded . He thoroughly enjoyed it. SA batted first and score more tha 200 runs. RCB responded very well with excellent scores by Dildhan and later by Virat Kohli. Gayle had given a good start. The match was almost lost towards the final stages. RCB after being in a good position lost their way, lost a number of wickets , the run rate sufferred and ir came to some 13 runs of the last over and 6 of the last ball. Unimaginable, Arun Karthik hit a six of the last ball and won the match for them. They made the semis by the skin of their teeth.
For semis there was a much larger crowd. We went for the Rs 750 ticket P3 Pavilion. Not as good as N stand. It was quite crowded also. We opted for this only because the entry gate to the stand was closer to the ticket counter .
Match again was a high scoring match.200 plus, Galye and Virat Kohli batted very well to win the match. It was a much easire win.
Vishaal as usual had his quota of chips and Coke . Was a bit scared the second day when the crowd was much more and in fact our stand was packed. I had to go and fetch some eatables for him from the stalls while he was sitting.
One the whole enjoyed the experience, may be the first day much more than the secodn day.
Sunday, October 9, 2011
Black Swan by Nassim Nicholas Taleb
Finished reading the book. Tough read.ay require reading a couple of times more. Almost like a text book. Difficult to digest the first time around. Kind fo sequel to Fooled by randomness by the same author.
Talks of rare and uncertain and unpredictable events, how they change the fortunes or course of events and history in the most significant manner. Has scant regard for what we term as bell curve and the ability to anticipate and extrapolate things based on past.Harps on the fact that if things are so predictable based on graphs and bell curve the markets and history would have been dull right through
It is the unpreditable events that have shaped the world more and have had a greater bearing on the world rather thanthe predcitable and anticipatable ones.
The loss or gain from Black swan or the rare events have a greater bearing than the regular ones.
Author is very well read and takes reference of various philosophers and scientists and mathematicians.
Has great regard for Karl Popper and Benoit Mandelbroit a mathematician , economist... who pioneered Fractals .
Talks of rare and uncertain and unpredictable events, how they change the fortunes or course of events and history in the most significant manner. Has scant regard for what we term as bell curve and the ability to anticipate and extrapolate things based on past.Harps on the fact that if things are so predictable based on graphs and bell curve the markets and history would have been dull right through
It is the unpreditable events that have shaped the world more and have had a greater bearing on the world rather thanthe predcitable and anticipatable ones.
The loss or gain from Black swan or the rare events have a greater bearing than the regular ones.
Author is very well read and takes reference of various philosophers and scientists and mathematicians.
Has great regard for Karl Popper and Benoit Mandelbroit a mathematician , economist... who pioneered Fractals .
Monday, September 12, 2011
Freakonomics by Steven Levitt and Stephen Dubner
It is not quite Economics but a research on various things and reasons for occurences of the same.
General tenency is to short list the most probable causes based on our own perception and may be sometimes from past and arrive at some factors as the most possible reason for the state of things.
For example, reduced crime could be attributed to increased policing, or could be attributed to worsening economic conditions,lower employment etc or could be due to drugs etc. The authors come out with making abortion legal way back in 1970 as the main reason in US for reduced crime in the 1990s. They talk of how unwantd pregnancy meant an unwanted child meant giving up on the child or bringing it up reluctantly or even abandoning it , leading to the child being a left to fend for themslves and getting sucked in to pettyu theft etc .
The authors talk of cheating by teachers in correction of examination papers to appear better. They basically bring out a list of negative and positive incentives which have a bearing on human behaviour and how they react to situations and things.
They in fact carry out detailed verification of the data on answer papers.
They talk of how Ku Klux klan was neautralised. Ku Klux Klan, essentially a racist brother hood amongst whites, had secret communication methods and hierarchy. That itself gave the members a feeling of exclusivity and a sense of power since the information sharing was just amongst the members . The moment this was out and widely publicised , their secrets were out and the apparent power and headiness they used to derive was lost. The authors bring out the fact that breaking the information secrecy had greater impact on breaking the organisation than policing etc.
Incidentally the cover page of Freakonomics with an apple on outside and ornage inside ( slice shown) , trying to bring out the fact that what is apparent outside is not what could be inside. This is part of the logo of Vikram Hospital and their " Different approach..."
Good book but not a earthshaking one in as much as it looks at things differently and bears out with examples the fact that what is apparent and obvious is not what the true cause could be.
General tenency is to short list the most probable causes based on our own perception and may be sometimes from past and arrive at some factors as the most possible reason for the state of things.
For example, reduced crime could be attributed to increased policing, or could be attributed to worsening economic conditions,lower employment etc or could be due to drugs etc. The authors come out with making abortion legal way back in 1970 as the main reason in US for reduced crime in the 1990s. They talk of how unwantd pregnancy meant an unwanted child meant giving up on the child or bringing it up reluctantly or even abandoning it , leading to the child being a left to fend for themslves and getting sucked in to pettyu theft etc .
The authors talk of cheating by teachers in correction of examination papers to appear better. They basically bring out a list of negative and positive incentives which have a bearing on human behaviour and how they react to situations and things.
They in fact carry out detailed verification of the data on answer papers.
They talk of how Ku Klux klan was neautralised. Ku Klux Klan, essentially a racist brother hood amongst whites, had secret communication methods and hierarchy. That itself gave the members a feeling of exclusivity and a sense of power since the information sharing was just amongst the members . The moment this was out and widely publicised , their secrets were out and the apparent power and headiness they used to derive was lost. The authors bring out the fact that breaking the information secrecy had greater impact on breaking the organisation than policing etc.
Incidentally the cover page of Freakonomics with an apple on outside and ornage inside ( slice shown) , trying to bring out the fact that what is apparent outside is not what could be inside. This is part of the logo of Vikram Hospital and their " Different approach..."
Good book but not a earthshaking one in as much as it looks at things differently and bears out with examples the fact that what is apparent and obvious is not what the true cause could be.
Thursday, September 1, 2011
Book by Jimmy Burns on Maradona
The book is titled Hand of God, aptly perhaps , the book being written by an Englishman, I think.
The author has done a lot of research getting in touch with a whole lot of people who were either involved directly or indirectly with Maradone during his playing days.
The accent is more on Maradona's activities, his personal life, his tantruns outside the Football field, his excesses, his temper etc.
Quite a spoilt genius whose aggressive behaviour appears , atleast in some parts to have been a response to deep seated complex. He had a himble background and tough growing up, only salvation for him and the family appears to have been Football.
Sad that such a great talent was miiused , ill advised. Obviously with that kind of background, one does not expect him to exercise great judgement which is where people around him should have played a balancing role. They all made merry and sponged off him, pushing in to a greater abyss.
The fact that he was able to perform so well in Mexico 1986 and win the cup for Argentina inspite of what had been happening on the personal front is a testimony of the extraordinary talent. He was a misfit in Barca which demanded discipline. May be a longer stint in Barca would have helped him get more disciplined and may be perform even better for a longer period.
This is what is helping Messi now. He has been part fo Barca and with Pep Guardiola who by all accounts is disciplined without being regimentattive.
Maradona by all accounts was in to drugs, women, Orgies along with the entire groups.
I recall his magic in 1986. I have not seen a better player, a player who could influence the entire team's performance with his individual performance. It was almost unreal.
Messi does have all the makings, but remains to be seen whether he could make the kind of impact that Maradona made in national colours.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)