Breakout Nations
by Ruchir Sharma
Excellent book a person who has
been working on emerging markets for several years and who has been studying
markets and economies for several years.High credibility and instead of just
theorizing the author has come out with specific examples of how the nations
have fared in the last 20-30 years and what they had done during the same
period. If they had got something right, he also given the background as to what
was done during that period and what kind of a leader was at the helm of
affairs.Conclusions are invariably based on empirical analysis and data .
Instead of deluging and deluding the
reader with too much and data, the author has given critical data , the data
which has and really had a huge bearing
on the way the economies of nations
fared.He has been consistent with the data. not cherry picking data to
suit a foregone conclusion. By and large one can see across the book that the
author focuses on country’s leadership,data on Debt to GDP ,the country’s
willingness to bring it to reasonable levels,
education eco system ,position of the currency and the strength of laws
for foreigners to come and do business or to invest.
The author comes out with a
telling observation as to the impact on economy and the GDP growth the type of
Government , whether democracy or dictatorial or strong state rule .. and comes to the
conclusion based on empirical data that it is just a 50:50 score, meaning that
it does not make an impact one way or other as a general concept but what
really matters is the kind of leader and the leadership
Some of the key takeaways from
the book , not necessarily in chronological or even logical order but the way I
can recall are as follows
§ More
than the type of Government it was the type of the leader which made the
difference.
§ Countries
which have been blessed with natural resources like oil, minerals have by and
large been in a roller coaster ride , that is when the commodities as it does
happen in most cases of commodities, they go through a turmoil barring a few
exceptions like Norway who have built some kind of a protection fund and have
also invested in other capabilities.He also brings home the point , especially
in case of resource rich but with a poor industrial and or education base,how
they need to get help fron technologically advanced developed nationbs to
extract the resources paying a huge money.
§ Nation
like Brazil whose currency is overvalued ,literally pricing itself out . Very
high USD costs
§ India
for all its confidence ( author terms it over confidence) at a per capita
income of $ 1400 is way below most of
the nations, in fact the onlt nations which are scraping below are
Bangladesh,Vietnam and Pakistana dn may be a few Islamic countries
§ Gives
an exceptional example of Turkey where power has shifted from the secular
parties to a more Islamic but not retrograde political leadership. This, per
author has brought the larger population to the mainstream without being
apologetic about their religious affiliations, sounds like current India. Of
course it is another question whether India will progress under NDA under whom
people do not have to be apologetic for being a religious and part of majority
to boot.
§ On
Nigeria , the author comments that it was one of the oil propelled economies
which lost it way and now trying to make a comeback under the leadership of
Jonathan Goodluck.
§ Philippines
,lost it way and trying to make a comeback under new leadership
§ Has
high praise for Czech republic and
Poland and to some extent for
Hungary .
§ Praise
for South Korea and how they have built apart from capability on manufacturing
, some great brands
§ In
this edition has also added some information on US and some European nations ,
As for US, the author feels that notwithstanding the high debt componebt of US
, its innovation plus the fact that it is rebuilding its manufacturing
capability ,helped to some extent by the falling USD would stand them in good
stead.
§ China
the wages are rising and Yuan rising , may lose its competitive edge a bit and
may not be able to sustain the 8-10% growth rate perennially.
§ Focusses
on GDP,Savings rate, debt in relation to GDP,Spend on Investment or consumption
,the currency and the interest rate.
§ Feels
that Japan has lost its way. To get a soft landing of the economic downslide,
Japan had foregone hard decisions in the 90 s and let the economy wallow or
chug along.
Emerging markets
|
||
Country
|
GDP in USD bn
|
Per capita in USD
|
Brazil
|
2,518
|
12,000
|
Chile
|
243
|
13,000
|
Colombia
|
321
|
7,000
|
Mexico
|
1,185
|
11,000
|
Peru
|
168
|
5,500
|
Czech republic
|
220
|
21,000
|
Hungary
|
148
|
15,000
|
Poland
|
532
|
14,000
|
Russia
|
1,885
|
13,000
|
Turkey
|
763
|
10,500
|
Eqypt
|
232
|
3,000
|
Monaco
|
120
|
3,000
|
South Africa
|
422
|
8,000
|
Emerging markets
China
|
6,988
|
5,000
|
India
|
1,843
|
1,400
|
Indonesia
|
834
|
3,500
|
Korea
|
1,164
|
23,500
|
Malaysia
|
248
|
8,000
|
Philippines
|
216
|
2,500
|
Taiwan
|
505
|
21,500
|
Thailand
|
339
|
5,000
|
Frontier Markets
|
||
Country
|
GDP in USD bn
|
Per capita in USD
|
Argentina
|
435
|
10,500
|
Ecuador
|
65
|
4,500
|
Panama
|
30
|
8,500
|
Jamaica
|
1,185
|
5,500
|
Trinidad & Tobago
|
22
|
17,000
|
Bulgaria
|
54
|
7,000
|
Croatia
|
64
|
14,500
|
Estonia
|
23
|
17,000
|
Latvia
|
27
|
12,000
|
Lithuania
|
43
|
13,000
|
Romania
|
185
|
8,000
|
Serbia
|
46
|
6,000
|
Slovenia
|
52
|
26,000
|
Ukraine
|
163
|
3,500
|
Botswana
|
16
|
9,000
|
Ghana
|
39
|
1,500
|
Kenya
|
36
|
1,000
|
Mauritius
|
11
|
8,500
|
Namibia
|
13
|
6,000
|
Nigeria
|
247
|
1,500
|
Tunisia
|
49
|
4,500
|
Bahrain
|
26
|
23,000
|
Jordan
|
28
|
4,500
|
Kuwait
|
171
|
46,500
|
Lebanon
|
41
|
10,500
|
Oman
|
67
|
21,500
|
Qatar
|
173
|
98,000
|
Saudi Arabia
|
560
|
20,000
|
UAE
|
358
|
66,500
|
Bangladesh
|
115
|
500
|
Kazhakstan
|
180
|
11,000
|
Pakistan
|
204
|
1,000
|
Sri Lanka
|
59
|
3,000
|
Vietnam
|
122
|
1,300
|